Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United States

1920 United States Supreme Court case
Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United States
Argued December 12, 1919
Decided January 26, 1920
Full case nameSilverthorne Lumber Co., Inc., et al. v. United States
Citations251 U.S. 385 (more)
40 S. Ct. 182; 64 L. Ed. 319; 1920 U.S. LEXIS 1685
Holding
To permit derivatives would encourage police to circumvent the Fourth Amendment, so the illegal copied evidence was held tainted and inadmissible.
Court membership
Chief Justice
Edward D. White
Associate Justices
Joseph McKenna · Oliver W. Holmes Jr.
William R. Day · Willis Van Devanter
Mahlon Pitney · James C. McReynolds
Louis Brandeis · John H. Clarke
Case opinions
MajorityHolmes, joined by McKenna, Day, Van Devanter, McReynolds, Brandeis, Clark
DissentWhite
DissentPitney

Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United States, 251 U.S. 385 (1920), was a U.S. Supreme Court decision in which Silverthorne had attempted to evade paying taxes. Federal agents illegally seized tax books from Silverthorne and created copies of the records. The ruling, delivered by Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr., was that any evidence obtained, even indirectly, from an illegal search was inadmissible in court. He reasoned that otherwise, police would have an incentive to circumvent the Fourth Amendment to obtain derivatives of the illegally obtained evidence.[1] This precedent later became known as the "fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine,"[2] and is an extension of the exclusionary rule.

Chief Justice Edward Douglass White and Associate Justice Mahlon Pitney dissented without a written opinion.

See also

Further reading

  • Killian, B. J. (1982). "United States v. Crews: Fruit of the Poisonous Tree—A New Wrinkle?". Idaho Law Review. 18: 151. ISSN 0019-1205.

References

  1. ^ Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United States, 251 U.S. 385 (1920).
  2. ^ Nardone v. United States, 308 U.S. 338 (1939).

External links

  • Works related to Silverthorne Lumber Company v. United States at Wikisource
  • Text of Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United States, 251 U.S. 385 (1920) is available from: CourtListener  Findlaw  Google Scholar  Justia  Library of Congress 
  • v
  • t
  • e
Scope of the Fourth Amendment
Definition of search
Open-fields doctrine
Aerial surveillance
Third-party doctrine
Definition of seizure
Fourth Amendment standing
Warrant requirement
Mere evidence rule
Neutral and detached magistrate
Warrants directed at third parties
Knock-and-announce
Exigent circumstances
Consent searches
Plain view
Vehicle searches
Searches incident to arrest
Breathalyzers, blood samples, DNA
Protective sweeps
Inventory searches
Border searches
Checkpoints
Students, employees, and patients
Property of probationers and parolees
Administrative inspections
Searches in jails and prisons
Warrantless arrests
Seizures
Distinguishing stops and arrests
Seizure of premises awaiting warrant
Detention incident to search
Detention during vehicle stop
Excessive force
Remedies
Exclusionary rule
Origins
Impeachment exception
Good-faith exception
Independent source
Inevitable discovery
Attenuation
No-knock searches
Habeas corpus review
Civil suit
Federal
State
Incorporation against States
Unreasonable search and seizure
Warrant requirements


Stub icon

This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.

  • v
  • t
  • e