Role ethics
Role ethics is an ethical theory based on family roles.[1] Morality is derived from a person's relationship with their community.[2] The ethics of Confucianism is an example of role ethics,[1] in particular the Three Fundamental Bonds and Five Constant Virtues (Chinese: 三綱五常; pinyin: Sāngāng Wǔcháng; Jyutping: Saam1 Gong1 Ng5 Soeng4; Pe̍h-ōe-jī: Sam-kòng Ngó͘-siông).
Confucianism
Confucian role ethics centers around filial piety or xiao, a respect for family members.[3] The concept is elaborated in the Confucian text Classic of Filial Piety: "In serving his parents, a filial son reveres them in daily life; he makes them happy while he nourishes them; he takes anxious care of them in sickness; he shows great sorrow over their death; and he sacrifices to them with solemnity."[4] Filial duty requires the desire to be filial, and not just the act of filial piety.[2] In Confucian societies, filial piety determines the "moral worth" of an individual in a community and acts as a form of social capital.[4]
According to Roger T. Ames and Henry Rosemont, "Confucian normativity is defined by living one's family roles to maximum effect." In Confucian role ethics, morality is based on a person's fulfillment of a role, such as that of a parent or a child. These roles are established as relationships, and are not individualistic. Confucian roles are not rational, and originate through the xin, or human emotions.[2]
The concept of li or ritual propriety is crucial to Confucian roles. Propriety reinforces family relationships, and binds together the community. The performance of li expresses a person's moral commitment as a human being.[2]
In Japan, modern Confucian scholars like Uno Tetsuto and Ichimura Sanjiro have attempted to mix Confucian role ethics with concepts such as democracy and human rights.[5]
Stoicism
Epictetus developed and introduced role ethics into Stoicism, an approach to ethics based on taking seriously the different roles we all play in life. The roles are:
- the general role of a human being in society (the human cosmopolis) at large;
- roles that we choose for ourselves, being a father, or friend;
- roles that the circumstances assign to us, being a son or daughter.
Epictetus’s role ethics was a development of a similar concept developed by Panaetius who was a philosopher of the middle Stoa.[6]
References
- ^ a b Roger T. Ames (30 April 2011). Confucian Role Ethics: A Vocabulary. University of Hawaiʻi Press. ISBN 978-0-8248-3576-7.
- ^ a b c d Chris Fraser; Dan Robins; Timothy O'Leary (1 May 2011). Ethics in Early China: An Anthology. Hong Kong University Press. pp. 17–35. ISBN 978-988-8028-93-1.
- ^ Wonsuk Chang; Leah Kalmanson (8 November 2010). Confucianism in Context: Classic Philosophy and Contemporary Issues, East Asia and Beyond. SUNY Press. p. 68. ISBN 978-1-4384-3191-8.
- ^ a b Charlotte Ikels, ed. (2004). Filial Piety: Practice and Discourse in Contemporary East Asia. Stanford University Press. pp. 3–5. ISBN 978-0-8047-4791-2. Retrieved 21 November 2012.
- ^ Oliver Leaman (2001). Encyclopedia of Asian Philosophy. Taylor & Francis. p. 191. ISBN 978-0-415-17281-3.
- ^ Pigliucci, Massimo (2020). The Stoic Guide to a Happy Life.
- v
- t
- e
- Authority
- Autonomy
- Common sense
- Compassion
- Conscience
- Consent
- Culture of life
- Dignity
- Double standard
- Duty
- Equality
- Etiquette
- Eudaimonia
- Family values
- Fidelity
- Free will
- Good and evil
- Happiness
- Honour
- Ideal
- Immorality
- Justice
- Liberty
- Loyalty
- Moral courage
- Moral hierarchy
- Moral imperative
- Morality
- Norm
- Political freedom
- Precept
- Rights
- Self-discipline
- Suffering
- Stewardship
- Sympathy
- Theodicy
- Trust
- Value
- Intrinsic
- Japan
- Western
- Vice
- Virtue
- Vow
- Wrong
- Laozi
- Socrates
- Plato
- Aristotle
- Diogenes
- Valluvar
- Cicero
- Confucius
- Augustine
- Mencius
- Mozi
- Xunzi
- Aquinas
- Spinoza
- Hume
- Kant
- Hegel
- Schopenhauer
- Bentham
- Mill
- Kierkegaard
- Sidgwick
- Nietzsche
- Moore
- Barth
- Tillich
- Bonhoeffer
- Foot
- Rawls
- Dewey
- Williams
- Mackie
- Anscombe
- Frankena
- MacIntyre
- Hare
- Singer
- Parfit
- Nagel
- Adams
- Taylor
- Azurmendi
- Korsgaard
- Nussbaum
- Nicomachean Ethics (c. 322 BC)
- Ethics (Spinoza) (1677)
- Fifteen Sermons Preached at the Rolls Chapel (1726)
- A Treatise of Human Nature (1740)
- The Theory of Moral Sentiments (1759)
- An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation (1780)
- Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals (1785)
- Critique of Practical Reason (1788)
- Elements of the Philosophy of Right (1820)
- Either/Or (1843)
- Utilitarianism (1861)
- The Methods of Ethics (1784)
- On the Genealogy of Morality (1887)
- Principia Ethica (1903)
- A Theory of Justice (1971)
- Animal Liberation (1975)
- Practical Ethics (1979)
- After Virtue (1981)
- Reasons and Persons (1984)
- Category