Polynomial decomposition

Factorization under function composition

In mathematics, a polynomial decomposition expresses a polynomial f as the functional composition g h {\displaystyle g\circ h} of polynomials g and h, where g and h have degree greater than 1; it is an algebraic functional decomposition. Algorithms are known for decomposing univariate polynomials in polynomial time.

Polynomials which are decomposable in this way are composite polynomials; those which are not are indecomposable polynomials or sometimes prime polynomials[1] (not to be confused with irreducible polynomials, which cannot be factored into products of polynomials). The degree of a composite polynomial is always a composite number, the product of the degrees of the composed polynomials.

The rest of this article discusses only univariate polynomials; algorithms also exist for multivariate polynomials of arbitrary degree.[2]

Examples

In the simplest case, one of the polynomials is a monomial. For example,

f = x 6 3 x 3 + 1 {\displaystyle f=x^{6}-3x^{3}+1}

decomposes into

g = x 2 3 x + 1  and  h = x 3 {\displaystyle g=x^{2}-3x+1{\text{ and }}h=x^{3}}

since

f ( x ) = ( g h ) ( x ) = g ( h ( x ) ) = g ( x 3 ) = ( x 3 ) 2 3 ( x 3 ) + 1 , {\displaystyle f(x)=(g\circ h)(x)=g(h(x))=g(x^{3})=(x^{3})^{2}-3(x^{3})+1,}

using the ring operator symbol to denote function composition.

Less trivially,

x 6 6 x 5 + 21 x 4 44 x 3 + 68 x 2 64 x + 41 = ( x 3 + 9 x 2 + 32 x + 41 ) ( x 2 2 x ) . {\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}&x^{6}-6x^{5}+21x^{4}-44x^{3}+68x^{2}-64x+41\\={}&(x^{3}+9x^{2}+32x+41)\circ (x^{2}-2x).\end{aligned}}}

Uniqueness

A polynomial may have distinct decompositions into indecomposable polynomials where f = g 1 g 2 g m = h 1 h 2 h n {\displaystyle f=g_{1}\circ g_{2}\circ \cdots \circ g_{m}=h_{1}\circ h_{2}\circ \cdots \circ h_{n}} where g i h i {\displaystyle g_{i}\neq h_{i}} for some i {\displaystyle i} . The restriction in the definition to polynomials of degree greater than one excludes the infinitely many decompositions possible with linear polynomials.

Joseph Ritt proved that m = n {\displaystyle m=n} , and the degrees of the components are the same up to linear transformations, but possibly in different order; this is Ritt's polynomial decomposition theorem.[1][3] For example, x 2 x 3 = x 3 x 2 {\displaystyle x^{2}\circ x^{3}=x^{3}\circ x^{2}} .

Applications

A polynomial decomposition may enable more efficient evaluation of a polynomial. For example,

x 8 + 4 x 7 + 10 x 6 + 16 x 5 + 19 x 4 + 16 x 3 + 10 x 2 + 4 x 1 = ( x 2 2 ) ( x 2 ) ( x 2 + x + 1 ) {\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}&x^{8}+4x^{7}+10x^{6}+16x^{5}+19x^{4}+16x^{3}+10x^{2}+4x-1\\={}&\left(x^{2}-2\right)\circ \left(x^{2}\right)\circ \left(x^{2}+x+1\right)\end{aligned}}}

can be calculated with 3 multiplications and 3 additions using the decomposition, while Horner's method would require 7 multiplications and 8 additions.

A polynomial decomposition enables calculation of symbolic roots using radicals, even for some irreducible polynomials. This technique is used in many computer algebra systems.[4] For example, using the decomposition

x 6 6 x 5 + 15 x 4 20 x 3 + 15 x 2 6 x 1 = ( x 3 2 ) ( x 2 2 x + 1 ) , {\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}&x^{6}-6x^{5}+15x^{4}-20x^{3}+15x^{2}-6x-1\\={}&\left(x^{3}-2\right)\circ \left(x^{2}-2x+1\right),\end{aligned}}}

the roots of this irreducible polynomial can be calculated as[5]

1 ± 2 1 / 6 , 1 ± 1 ± 3 i 2 1 / 3 . {\displaystyle 1\pm 2^{1/6},1\pm {\frac {\sqrt {-1\pm {\sqrt {3}}i}}{2^{1/3}}}.}

Even in the case of quartic polynomials, where there is an explicit formula for the roots, solving using the decomposition often gives a simpler form. For example, the decomposition

x 4 8 x 3 + 18 x 2 8 x + 2 = ( x 2 + 1 ) ( x 2 4 x + 1 ) {\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}&x^{4}-8x^{3}+18x^{2}-8x+2\\={}&(x^{2}+1)\circ (x^{2}-4x+1)\end{aligned}}}

gives the roots[5]

2 ± 3 ± i {\displaystyle 2\pm {\sqrt {3\pm i}}}

but straightforward application of the quartic formula gives equivalent results but in a form that is difficult to simplify and difficult to understand; one of the four roots is:

2 9 ( 8 10 i 3 3 / 2 + 72 ) 2 / 3 + 36 ( 8 10 i 3 3 / 2 + 72 ) 1 / 3 + 156 ( 8 10 i 3 3 / 2 + 72 ) 1 / 3 6 ( 8 10 i 3 3 / 2 + 72 ) 1 / 3 52 3 ( 8 10 i 3 3 / 2 + 72 ) 1 / 3 + 8 2 . {\displaystyle 2-{\frac {\sqrt {{9\left({\frac {8{\sqrt {10}}i}{3^{3/2}}}+72\right)^{2/3}+36\left({\frac {8{\sqrt {10}}i}{3^{3/2}}}+72\right)^{1/3}+156} \over {\left({\frac {8{\sqrt {10}}i}{3^{3/2}}}+72\right)^{1/3}}}}{6}}-{{\sqrt {-\left({\frac {8{\sqrt {10}}i}{3^{3/2}}}+72\right)^{1/3}-{{52} \over {3\left({\frac {8{\sqrt {10}}i}{3^{3/2}}}+72\right)^{1/3}}}+8}} \over 2}.}

Algorithms

The first algorithm for polynomial decomposition was published in 1985,[6] though it had been discovered in 1976,[7] and implemented in the Macsyma/Maxima computer algebra system.[8] That algorithm takes exponential time in worst case, but works independently of the characteristic of the underlying field.

A 1989 algorithm runs in polynomial time but with restrictions on the characteristic.[9]

A 2014 algorithm calculates a decomposition in polynomial time and without restrictions on the characteristic.[10]

Notes

  1. ^ a b J.F. Ritt, "Prime and Composite Polynomials", Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 23:1:51–66 (January, 1922) doi:10.2307/1988911 JSTOR 1988911
  2. ^ Jean-Charles Faugère, Ludovic Perret, "An efficient algorithm for decomposing multivariate polynomials and its applications to cryptography", Journal of Symbolic Computation, 44:1676-1689 (2009), doi:10.1016/j.jsc.2008.02.005
  3. ^ Capi Corrales-Rodrigáñez, "A note on Ritt's theorem on decomposition of polynomials", Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra 68:3:293–296 (6 December 1990) doi:10.1016/0022-4049(90)90086-W
  4. ^ The examples below were calculated using Maxima.
  5. ^ a b Where each ± is taken independently.
  6. ^ David R. Barton, Richard Zippel (1985). "Polynomial Decomposition Algorithms". Journal of Symbolic Computation. 1 (2): 159–168. doi:10.1016/S0747-7171(85)80012-2.
  7. ^ Richard Zippel, Functional Decomposition, 1996.
  8. ^ See the polydecomp function.
  9. ^ Kozen, Dexter; Landau, Susan (1989). "Polynomial Decomposition Algorithms". Journal of Symbolic Computation. 7 (5): 445–456. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.416.6491. doi:10.1016/S0747-7171(89)80027-6.
  10. ^ Raoul Blankertz (2014). "A polynomial time algorithm for computing all minimal decompositions of a polynomial" (PDF). ACM Communications in Computer Algebra. 48 (187): 1. Archived 2015-09-24 at the Wayback Machine

References

  • Joel S. Cohen (2003). "Chapter 5. Polynomial Decomposition". Computer Algebra and Symbolic Computation. ISBN 1-56881-159-4.